Where an information was filed against OP glass manufacturing company on grounds that it entered into agreements in violation of section 3 with some of its processor / distributors and imposed exclusive purchase and forced co-branding obligations, however, informant was not able to produce a valid and subsisting copy of said agreement on which entire allegations rested and impositions on processor had objective justifications, no case was made out against OP in respect of either sections 3(4) or 4 and, thus, such information was to be closed forthwith under section 26(2) – XYZ (Confidential) v. Saint Gobain India (P.) Ltd. – [2024] 164 taxmann.com 577 (CCI)
Skip to content
Skip to footer